One part classic redux. One part steampunk. One part gothic. And a few pinches of new and different in there and you get Bethany Griffin’s Masque of the Red Death, the intriguing spin-off of Edgar Allan Poe’s short story classic of the same name.
After reading (and enjoying!) Griffin’s The Fall, it seemed like a pretty good bet to give her better known and more highly acclaimed book a chance, too. I’m not sure exactly what I expected, but it is quite similar in style to The Fall. Essentially, we see a little more of the characters we meet in Poe’s original tale, but that’s where the similarities end. Indeed, in The Fall there is even a certain amount of closure as a stand-alone read, whereas here, Ms. Griffin’s story was broken into two books, and we don’t really even approach the heart of what makes up Poe’s story until the very end, when we do begin to get some mention of a massive masque ball being hosted by Prince Prospero at his giant gothic castle on the outskirts of a (quite literally) dying city.
And Ms. Griffin’s story really plays up all the Victorian era goodness that one might expect from a tale of this period, and particularly one from gothic master Poe. We see death and destruction, mayhem, violence, a massive divide between the rich and the poor, the reliance on science to create faith and to allow the people to see hope and possibility past the massive wave of disease overtaking (potentially) the world. Indeed, the countersurgence against Prince Prospero’s self-absorbed reign is led by the Reverend Malcontent, who effectively home grows a rebellion throughout the course of the story.
I have to say that I was somewhat surprised by the steampunk element thrown in for good measure. It’s omnipresent in the lifestyle that Araby leads, and effects all of the denizens of the broken city. The horses have died, so only the extremely wealthy get steam carriages to drive them about; the air is filled with contagious disease amoebas or something, so those who can afford one walk around with face masks (and those who don’t apparently stay shut up tight indoors or die pretty quickly); the poor are clearly dangerous, so the wealthiest live in a protective tower; a hot air balloon provides a chance to rendezvous at a non-fatal-to-remove-one’s-mask altitude; a zephyr provides escape.
Our protagonist, Araby, is hell-bent on destroying herself on her way to attaining “oblivion” (the use of the word, for some reason, made me think of John Green’s The Fault in Our Stars, but for no reason other than that that word is used somewhat repeatedly in Mr. Green’s work. And with better reason and purpose). Her father seems to be thrown up as a point of debate: he created the masks that have saved those wealthy enough to buy one, but there’s a suggestion that he may also have been responsible for the disease that caused the need for them. So he’s a generally distracted and distant mess, who’s under the watch and control of Prince Prospero. Her mother is a weak, nervous woman for reasons that Araby doesn’t know nor cares to find out.
Araby, for her part, is annoying. She’s weak, she’s self-absorbed and, to be honest, she ain’t the sharpest tool in the shed. She spends her days, from what the book suggests, living the life of a Victorian era socialite: she lounges about her posh apartment building during the day, reads, stares out the window, then in the evening perks up to go out to the Debauchery District with the Prince’s niece, April, to get wasted (back to that “oblivion” idea). She then proceeds to stay out most of the night before stumbling back home to sleep off the morning and repeat, day after day. Despite the fact that so many people can’t afford masks to keep them alive. Despite the fact that she has wealth, safety and privilege that so many in this society would kill for. Despite her mother’s concern for her and her father’s constant work.
All of this eventually culminates in riots in the city, Araby’s dealings with an awkward love triangle, and the rise of Reverend Malcontent’s thugs in a city-wide uprising.
What I Liked About the Story:
1. It’s very atmospheric, with strong lines drawn between “the haves” and “the have nots.” This is in keeping with writing of Poe’s time, when authors tended to paint a very bleak picture of what it was like to be on the poorer side of life. The author’s pretty good at being consistent with it, too.
2. We don’t have a clear picture of what’s going on in the beginning going into the story, and as a result, you really do turn the pages to understand the full picture (which you still only marginally get, but something’s better than nothing). The relationships between people, peoples’ motivations, etc, are all revealed in bits and pieces, which is preferable over having them all laid out for you.
3. The interplay of science and it’s place in this society is intriguing to me. We see new inventions, new technology, the melding of familiar structures with unfamiliar purposes. I dig it because not only was this a major idea in Poe’s time, but it’s something that I could imagine–in this type of slow disaster scenario–people taking seriously and trying to put all their faith into.
4. Speaking of faith, Ms. Griffin does an equally intriguing job of building the idea of science as a form of religion. In a time when churches generally seem to be defunct and people are still trying to find something to believe in, when people are dying left and right by the hundreds and then (and sometimes even before they’ve died) being fed to the crocodiles, the masses are still trying to locate something worth continuing to have faith about. And science, as we see through Araby’s father’s work, seems to be what they’ve decided to believe in. Seems like a safe bet in this scenario, too, at least until science stops having all the answers and humanity itself becomes more dangerous.
5. But similarly, and so as not to really take sides completely, Ms. Griffin still lets us in on the fallacy of science. We learn about how it was scientists who created the contagion as well as a new strain, the Red Death, which have been unleashed on the people. We learn it was scientists who decided to bring in the crocodiles, yes, but it was also scientists who brought in bats before that, which now attack people on the streets. I guess what I liked was that nothing in this book–and no one–is infallible. There is no one hero, just as there is no one solution.
What I Didn’t Love:
1. Araby is really annoying. Talk about self absorbed! And, really, at 17, she should have developed enough to understand that her actions do have consequences and that they do affect the other people around her. What’s more, she should also be able to realize that her parents are not going to tell her every single thing they think, believe, breath, or experience–but that there’s probably a reason behind why they did what they did.
2. The love triangle is annoying and confusing. Both of Araby’s purported love interests are just . . . awkward. Both with her as their respective interest and, well, in general. And while Araby’s not what one might consider to be gifted in the social graces herself, she’s at least moderately socially aware. Her actions are at once weird and self-absorbed while also self-protective, as she clings to her morbid obsession with her brother’s death years earlier.
3. Araby’s immature response to her brother’s death is inconsistent. One might assume that she’s going to be hurt and scarred by it for the rest of her life, but that doesn’t really mean she has to be a drug addict/alcoholic in doing so. That she blames her parents for it, and respects them less as a result of it, is also unfair. Additionally, her vow–not to experience anything that her brother didn’t have the chance to–is almost laughable in it’s hit-and-miss application in her life. It becomes her go-to excuse for not experiencing any kind of intimacy, but beyond that Araby seems to feel no need to apply it. I’m pretty certain her brother didn’t get a chance to party all night, experiment with drugs, drink, wear extravagant clothes, ride in a steam carriage, etc. But those aren’t concerns for her. One boy trying to hold her hand, though? Enough for a full-on guilt-laden panic attack. Hm.
4. There is a lot happening in the city that’s just blatantly . . . wrong. And while I understand that we’re dealing with a different time in a different place with different laws and expectations, I have a lot of difficulty swallowing that an entire society would just accept what Prospero’s thrust upon them. Especially when it means the death of countless thousands.
5. There are a lot of loose ends, presumably tied up in the second book, but which I’m not sure the purpose of which are. Old men who hang out harassing Araby at the Debauchery Club? The concierge that Araby tries to get a mask for and eventually sends on his way? The diseased-but-not-dead living in the marsh? The sacrifices that Elliot eluded to by the marsh dwellers? The purpose of Will to the story? The wild, rogue bats? The list goes on and on–and I’m not certain that answers are forthcoming, but I suppose I must reserve judgment until I read the next installment.
Overall:
So I guess, after taking more time to really hash through my own thoughts, I’m really not completely sold on this. I really want to love it, but there are a number of annoyances that keep nagging at me. As an avid Poe lover, though, I’ll probably pick up the next book. And if you’re willing to give it a chance–and suspend a lot of disbelief–this is a pretty engaging read.
What do you think? Anyone read this and find Araby more pleasant than I?