There seems to be a trend happening in YA Lit, and it’s somewhat a disappointing one: that of the oddly wishy-washy female protagonist. Now, I get that art imitates life and all that jazz, and that not all females are devoutly, stubbornly focused on their goals. OR that all even have goals. However, I feel like once again I’m reading about a female protagonist who has a) no real personality, b) no goals of her own, c) no gumption, d) is kind of annoying. Essentially, she’s just there: we know she likes coffee, and loved her grandmother, and dislikes her brother. We know she has a thing for old records and reading and hasn’t had much interest in boys until now. But beyond that? Yeah. Kind of a boring canvas, that.
This isn’t a new critique of mine. I feel like I’m becoming a bit of a broken record about it, in fact. Have authors given up on injecting some life into their young heroines? Or are we, the YA Lit market, unwilling to accept a little spunk? I know I had similar thoughts about Lauren Oliver’s Lena in Delirium, about Bethany Griffin’s Araby in Masque of the Red Death and Madeline in The Fall, even (though to a far lesser extent) about Martina Boone’s Barrie in Compulsion.
That’s not to say that April Tucholke’s Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea doesn’t tell an interesting yarn, or to suggest that it’s not a well-written tale, either. BUT. Should she have created a less ghost-like protagonist character/personality, I think it would have made for a far more interesting tale.
That critique aside, I think that the story itself weaves some interesting themes, but I finished feeling kind of disappointed. The latest wave of YA Lit that I’ve been picking up has a decidedly deathly undertone to it, and I, for one, like it! We have demons in Michelle Knudsen’s Evil Librarian, grim reapers gone wild in Gina Damico’s Croak series, curses galore in Martina Boone’s Heirs of Watson Island Trilogy, and now?
Well, despite the suggestive title, we have none of these. Because, though the title suggests a devil (or devilry, at the very least), I didn’t really see a whole lot of that. What I did see? A whole bunch of super self absorbed rich or once-rich kids wreaking havoc on “the peasants” (as a certain famous other self-absorbed rich kid said in the news recently, to describe the hoi polloi), lazing about and feeling particularly sorry for themselves, or else being generally pretty pointless.
The story is set in the sleepy oceanside town of Echo, where twins Luke and Violet White (of the once-upon-a-time-ago famously wealthy Whites) live in a decaying mansion by the sea because the family’s money has dried up, their parents apparently refuse to either be parents or to be adults and work to make money so they’ve disappeared to Europe, and Freddie–their grandmother and general caretaker–has died, leaving them to tend to themselves.
As their home is falling apart around them, Violet spends her days reading and going to town for coffee. She makes a point of explaining that they don’t have money for food anymore, so I’m not entirely certain where she gets the money for lattes, but I suppose that that’s beside the point. Her brother seems to spend the days lifting weights, trying to impress others around town and generally belittle his sister. One day Violet comes upon an idea to make money for food by renting their guesthouse, and rent it she does: to one River West, attractive young boy about her age who pays her for a month in cash from a thick wad of green bills. Violet apparently thinks nothing of this, and it doesn’t occur to her to ask for any ID or anything. She immediately is charmed and amazed over River, and they immediately become buddies.
As the story continues, we see one strange thing after another occurring in town. Dangerous things; death and insanity and dismay. When River’s brother comes to town, we learn more about this mysteriously distrustful character, but not before Violet’s world has been turned upside down. And certainly not before she’s randomly decided to spend most nights sleeping with this boy she doesn’t know really anything about–other than the fact that he’s mysterious and keeps lying to her. (sounds like a great romance, huh?)
Here’s What I Liked About the Book:
1. It is an interesting tale, because you really don’t know what’s going to happen along the way. Not because you couldn’t have predicted it, but because the clues you get along the way suggest the possibility of so much more that’s so different from what actually happens, that you’d have to be wrong in guessing.
2. Violet and Luke aren’t best friends, and I think that that’s an interesting relationship to depict in YA Lit. For some reason, almost every YA Lit book I’ve picked up involving twin siblings or else siblings close in age shows them as being the very bestest of friends. I know this isn’t always the case, especially in YA years. So while Luke is a jerk, it was nice to see something other than the constantly lovingly perfect sibling relationship we tend to otherwise see.
3. The setting is classic gothic, with large crumbling mansions by the sea, hidden letters, family secrets, decrepit graveyards. .. . it really makes quite the atmosphere, and is highly reminiscent of the setting in Martina Boone’s Compulsion.
What I Didn’t Much Like About the Novel:
1. As noted, Violet’s got the personality of a used dishcloth.
2. I had some major issues in suspending my disbelief that two young people would be able to be left by themselves for extended periods of time and no one was in the least worried or curious. Not because I don’t think parents can do that, but because I would think social services couldn’t. This felt pretty unrealistic to me, but then, it’s YA Lit, so I apparently need to work harder at my disbelief suspension.
3. Luke’s a flaming jerk through the first half of the book. He seems to always be lurking somewhere around, and always making ridiculously sexist comments. But he seems magically to kind of just disappear in the second half of the book and to have become a changed man or something, because he loses the sexism side of him pretty suddenly and quickly, with no warning whatsoever.
4. I have some major issues with the picture of Violet–innocent, uninterested in boys, no experience dating, very bookish, somewhat obsessed with her dead grandmother with a religious fervor–suddenly snuggling up in a stranger’s bed. Repeatedly. He moves in and like that night, she’s walking uninvited into his rented guesthouse and crawling in. But she doesn’t just do it once! Even once she knows he’s lying to her repeatedly she continues to be stuck under his thrall for reasons I don’t get. I understand that he’s supposed to have some kind of ability to nudge her thoughts, but come on. Plus, the fact that she keeps getting caught by other boys in bed with this veritable stranger and not thinking anything of it? Again, I’m not buying it.
5. On a side note complaint, apparently Luke and Violet couldn’t afford to buy food, but once they get River’s rent money, they’re shopping at the small town equivalent of Whole Foods? Really?
6. How is the town not more concerned about the string of strange events suddenly happening in it? We have a disappeared child, a “devil” spotting, a dead kid, a dead man. . . the list keeps going. Yet the town itself seems to see nothing strange or wrong with this?
7. I’m not sure I understand what the scary is here. River has a power he calls “the glow.” We later hear of a similar power referred to as “the spark.” Both of these seem to be psychic in nature. But this book just seems full of potential promises it doesn’t really deliver on.
8. The ending. Really? Mom and dad just miraculously show up out of nowhere and Luke’s now crying? They have no problem with taking in an extra mouth to feed when none of them seem willing to actually work and they don’t have money? Even with whatever mom and dad brought back from dad’s “sold out” art show in Paris, I can’t imagine that long term commitment being something they’re pleased with.
9. It seems like a very incestuous series of relationships that these wealthy Reddings and Whites have. I honestly didn’t care enough to follow too closely, but geez.
10. Sunshine, Violet’s only friend/neighbor, is depicted repeatedly as being a slut. Violet’s depicted as being a bookish prude who’s not interested in the male species at all. Apparently, there is no in-between. No normal YA reaction to guys. Either you’re “a strumpet” or you’re completely unaware of the male species. Again, really?
Overall:
Meh. I really, really wanted to like this book and, having now read it, I didn’t feel like I didn’t enjoy it. I just felt like I was doing an *awful* lot of suspending disbelief and eye rolling along the way. The writing is well done, but between the stupendously overdone use of tropes that are not related to the story, the lack of a real plot (you’ll note I don’t summarize one for you above–that’s because I’m still trying to find it) and some notably poorly drawn characters, well, this author could have written a better story, no doubt in my mind.
Anyone else out there read this one? Thoughts?